Check out our guns!

The Supreme Court ruled today that the Chicago law banning all handguns is unconstitutional. The Court said that the ban went too far by not allowing citizens to have a weapon for self defense in their home. That is all fine and good, but doesn’t anyone else realize the problem with all of this? The problem is this; the constitution allows the right to bear arms not for the reason of self defense, but rather as weapons that could be potentially be used against the government in the case of the government overstepping its boundaries. How many times have you heard the idiot that whines about people owning assault rifles? “What do you need an assault rifle for? You don’t use an AK-47 for hunting; you only use it for killing people.” That’s right, that is what an assault rifle is for, killing people. When the government starts screwing up, it is the duty of an American Citizen to rise up and destroy the oppressive government. Now, most people feel as though they are better off living in the current United States than starting a rebellion and possibly getting killed in the process, but that is what the second amendment is for, not self defense. My stance is this; as long as you are not a felon, have as many guns of any type that you want. I don’t care. To all of you gun proponents; stop screwing up the argument by bringing in the self defense angle. If you allow that to enter your argument, people will refute your position. The second amendment allows you to have guns for one reason; shooting government oppression right between the eyes.